This is ForecastNest’s 1 day forecast for IONQ, created 2026-08-20 20:13 UTC. The window closed 2026-08-21 20:13 UTC, when IONQ closed at $44.85, up 8.0% from $41.52 when the forecast was made. It traded between $42.01 and $45.46 along the way (+1.2% to +9.5%).
Prediction window: Equity / ETF 1D: the stored target below is authoritative; it may be a session close or an intraday instant.
Prediction time: 2026-08-20 20:13 UTC (8/20/2026, 4:13:49 PM EDT).
Valid until: 2026-08-21 20:13 UTC (8/21/2026, 4:13:49 PM EDT). Target session: 2026-08-21 (New York); Stored expiry outside regular session. Lead time to expiry: 24 elapsed hours. Timing: After close. Based on stored prediction time, not verified model execution time.
Want to forecast IONQ -- or any other stock or ETF -- with your own model and see how it stacks up against these? Create your own AI model benchmark on ForecastNest.
1 of the 1 model called a direction, and 1 of that call was right.
Below are the details.
| Model | Range | Move | Confidence | Price it found | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT — GPT-5 | $39.70–$44.80 | -4.4% to +7.9% | 69% | — | 82.8 | right |
How these models have done on IONQ over 1 day
This forecast is settled and is included in the statistics below. The remaining records are forecasts created before 2026-08-20 20:13 UTC. Only settled directional calls count toward accuracy.
| Model | Asked | Still open | No call | Called up | Called down | Right |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT — GPT-5 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 · 1 right | — | 100% (1/1) |
Every published IONQ forecast these models made over 1 day before this question was asked, on 2026-08-20 20:13 UTC, plus this settled forecast. Forecasts created after this question are excluded. Results reflect the settlements available when this article is generated. A day-ahead call and a week-ahead one are counted separately — they are different questions. Only settled forecasts are graded, so open + no call + up + down adds up to asked. “No call” is a range too centred on the price to be pointing anywhere. Accuracy counts only forecasts that have settled, and the count behind it is shown beside it — a single right call is not a 100% record.
What each model said
ChatGPT — GPT-5
Result: right
View full reasoning
Market Regime Assessment: IONQ is in a short-term downward/corrective regime, but not yet in a confirmed longer-term structural breakdown. The dominant regime for the next 1 day is bearish-to-mean-reverting: the 1h and 4h charts show strong directional selling pressure after a roughly 11% 24-hour decline, while narrowing Bollinger bandwidth and falling ATR indicate that the initial volatility shock is beginning to compress. This argues for continued downside bias, but also materially increases the probability of a technical rebound or consolidation rather than another equally large straight-line decline. Technical Synthesis & Timeframe Logic: Because the horizon is only 1 day, the 1h and 4h signals deserve the greatest weight. The 1h chart is bearish: ADX 44 with -DI well above +DI confirms a strong near-term bearish trend, price remains below the 9EMA and both 20EMA/50EMA, and OBV is falling. However, RSI 35 is rising, Stochastic has %K above %D, and the MACD histogram is becoming less negative, showing that the bearish impulse is losing some acceleration. The 4h chart is more important for distinguishing continuation from reversal. It remains bearish because MACD histogram is falling, ADX 30 confirms directional strength, -DI exceeds +DI, and price is substantially below the 9EMA despite the medium-term EMA stack remaining bullish. The 4h Stochastic at 17/21 is oversold, and RSI has risen to 44, creating a credible rebound setup but not yet a bullish reversal. The daily chart is mixed and therefore receives less weight for the immediate forecast: RSI 48 is neutral, 9EMA remains above 26EMA, and MACD is still positive, but the histogram is deteriorating, 20EMA is below 50EMA, OBV is falling, and price is below its short-term averages. The weekly chart is also mixed rather than decisively bullish: the 20EMA remains above 50EMA and weekly Stochastic has turned upward, but ADX is only 17 and price is below the 9EMA and 26EMA. Thus the higher timeframes constrain the bearish forecast from becoming aggressively negative, but they do not override the immediate 1h/4h downside structure. Sentiment Context & Integration: The supplied sentiment score of 62/100 is bullish, but this should be interpreted as a slower-moving stabilizing input because it is derived from daily technical conditions. It supports the possibility that buyers remain interested in IONQ at lower prices, yet the recent intraday price action shows that those bullish background conditions have not translated into immediate buying pressure. Therefore sentiment reduces downside conviction somewhat but does not overturn the near-term bearish signal. Price Range Justification with ATR/S/R Reference: The $40.00-$40.34 zone is the key near-term support cluster, with both the 1h and 4h analyses identifying support almost exactly there. That makes a retest of this area highly plausible over the forecast window. A move modestly below it toward roughly $39.70 is reasonable because the 4h ATR is 4.5% and the stock has just experienced an unusually large decline. However, the declining ATR and narrowing bands argue against assuming another extreme expansion immediately. On the upside, the first meaningful 1h resistance is $45.55, while the 4h resistance is much higher at $47.95. Given the bearish 4h momentum, reaching $47.95 within one day is unlikely without a strong catalyst. A rebound into the low-to-mid $44s is more realistic, while $44.80 leaves room for a substantial oversold bounce without requiring a complete trend reversal. The resulting $39.70-$44.80 range is intentionally wider than a simple average-volatility estimate because IONQ's recent price shock and historically high ATR justify allowing for a larger move, while the major support/resistance structure keeps the forecast bounded. Counter-Argument & Key Risks: The strongest bullish case is that the sharp selloff has pushed the 4h Stochastic into oversold territory, 1h RSI is recovering from 35, the 1h MACD histogram is improving, 4h OBV is rising, and the longer-term weekly EMA structure remains bullish. If $40.00-$40.34 holds firmly and price reclaims $41.83-$43.00, short covering could accelerate a rebound toward $44.50-$45.55. The main bearish risk is a decisive breakdown below $40.00. That would invalidate the immediate support structure and could expose substantially lower levels because the daily support is far below at $31.81. Another risk is that the very high historical volatility of IONQ makes technical levels less reliable during news-driven moves. Confidence Attribution & Catalysts: Confidence is 69% because the 1h and 4h bearish signals are reasonably aligned and directly relevant to a 1-day horizon, while the daily and weekly charts introduce enough bullish structure to prevent high conviction. The most important catalysts are price behavior around $40.00-$40.34, whether the 1h 9EMA near $41.83 can be reclaimed, and whether price can recover through $43.00. Overall, the highest-probability path is a retest or brief undershoot of the $40 area followed by stabilization or an oversold rebound, with a bearish bias still dominating unless the stock decisively reclaims the $43-$44 zone.
Read this comparison on ForecastNest, where it stays up to date if a score is ever recomputed.
Published automatically when this question settled, from shared research a member chose to make public. Content on ForecastNest Insights is for research, educational and informational purposes only. Nothing here is financial, investment, legal or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell anything.